Penetration testing (pentesting) has long been a cornerstone of security practices, particularly for meeting compliance requirements. However, a recent conversation with a client revealed a crucial gap in this approach. Critical vulnerabilities — particularly in their APIs and third-party software — remained unaddressed despite passing their pentest. While the pentest checked the compliance box, it did not account for the real world, evolving threats their system faced.

Although compliance-driven tests serve their purpose, they often leave organizations exposed to risks such as API abuse, supply chain vulnerabilities and insider threats. Many organizations treat pentesting as a routine task, missing out on a broader strategy to defend against the ever-changing threats.

Step 1 of 7

14%

Which of the following best describes how you currently monitor and manage systems across your hybrid cloud environment?(Required)

Multiple separate tools for different environments

Multiple separate tools for different monitoring and management functions

Single consolidated dashboard

Custom built monitoring and management solution

No full monitoring and management solution

Don’t know

How valuable would it be for your monitoring and management solution to incorporate predictive analytics to help you identify and address system issues that are critical and not waste time or effort working through all the data and “noise” that is not critical?(Required)

Extremely valuable

Moderately valuable

Somewhat valuable

Slightly valuable

Not valuable

How do you most typically address potential system issues BEFORE they impact your operations?(Required)

Automated workflows and playbooks to remediate potential issues as soon as they are detected

An orchestrated response process that leverages automation, AI, and human expertise to rapidly respond to potential issues

Advanced monitoring tools such as predictive analytics and anomaly detection to proactively identify and address potential issues

Respond to issues as they arise, using manual processes and troubleshooting techniques

A combination of automated remediation, orchestrated response, and/or proactive monitoring to address potential system issues

Don’t know

Other

What methods does your organization use to control and monitor cloud/IT spending?(Required)

Centralized procurement processes

Pre-approved budget thresholds

Automated cost monitoring tools

Department-level spending controls

Regular cost audits and reviews

Cloud cost optimization platform

Approval workflows for resource provisioning

Native financial operations tools provided by the cloud provider

No formal controls in place

Don’t know

Other

Please specify:

Which methods do you rely on most to detect security vulnerabilities in your systems?(Required)

Automated scanning tools

Manual assessments

Vendor notifications

Threat modeling (for early detection)

None of these

Don’t know

Other

Please specify:

What are the TWO most common ways you prioritize vulnerabilities to address within your environment?(Required)

Based on potential impact

Based on exploitability

Regulatory compliance requirements

Based on CVSS scores

Risk-based analysis of multiple factors

First-in-first-out approach

No formal prioritization process

Don’t know

How do you typically handle system updates and security patches?(Required)

Automated updates and patches

Manually review and apply updates and patches on a regular schedule

A combination of automation and manual review

Apply updates and patches on an as-needed basis.

Outsourced update and patch management

No defined process

Don’t know

Other

Δ

Where Traditional Pentests Fall Short in a DevOps Environment

The compliance-driven pen tests tend to follow static checklists. This approach often overlooks the dynamic nature of modern infrastructures, especially in environments with rapid deployments, cloud services and third-party integrations. These tests may not adapt quickly enough to the new risks that emerge as the systems evolve.

For example, vulnerabilities in open-source components or dependencies in the software supply chain often go undetected in traditional pentests. This can create a false sense of security — your system may pass compliance, but still be vulnerable to real-world attacks.

Threat Modeling: A Shift Toward Risk-Based Testing

Integrating threat modeling into your security strategy offers a more tailored, risk-focused approach. Instead of asking ‘What is vulnerable’, threat modeling shifts the focus to ‘What could go wrong’ and ‘How could an attacker exploit this system’. This proactive method aligns with the fast-paced, iterative nature of DevOps, helping in identifying risks earlier in the development cycle.

In a recent case, we worked with a cloud-based company that had passed several pentests but was concerned about their API security. Through threat modeling, we uncovered a critical vulnerability in their session handling that previous tests had missed. The company mitigated a serious security risk by addressing this issue early before it could be exploited.

Optimizing Resources with Targeted Testing

One of the key benefits of integrating threat modeling with pentesting is the ability to focus resources where they matter the most. For DevOps teams managing fast-moving pipelines, threat modeling ensures that pentesting efforts are concentrated on high-risk areas rather than spread thin across the entire system.

For instance, consider a cloud infrastructure security test that used a threat modeling framework to target identity management. The test revealed vulnerabilities related to privilege escalation that a broad, compliance-focused pentest might have missed. This targeted approach allowed the team to resolve the issues quickly, reducing risk without overextending resources.

How to Integrate Threat Modeling Into Your DevOps Workflow

To make pentesting more effective and align security with your DevOps processes, consider integrating threat modeling into your workflow. Here are four actionable steps to get started:

1. Adopt a Threat Modeling Framework
   Use frameworks like STRIDE or PASTA to structure your threat modeling efforts. These frameworks help prioritize the attack vectors specific to your environment, allowing you to focus on the highest risks.
2. Automate the Threat Modeling Process
   In fast-paced DevOps environments, automation is essential. Automating threat modeling ensures that the models evolve as your system changes, continuously identifying the potential risks and updating security practices. This prevents critical vulnerabilities from being overlooked as development progresses.
3. Embed Threat Modeling in CI/CD Pipelines
   To align security with DevOps, threat modeling should be embedded into your CI/CD pipeline. This allows teams to catch vulnerabilities early before they reach production. Integrating threat modeling into build and deployment processes ensures that the security is proactive, not reactive.
4. Foster Cross-Team Collaboration
   Threat modeling should involve more than just security professionals. Developers, architects and operations teams must collaborate to ensure the threat model reflects the system’s architecture and business needs. This cross-functional approach creates a holistic view of potential risks and strengthens your defenses.

Case Study: Threat Modeling for Cloud Security

A healthcare provider applied the STRIDE methodology to their cloud infrastructure, focusing specifically on identity management and session handling. By using this threat modeling framework, they identified vulnerabilities related to privilege escalation that the previous pentests had missed. This allowed the team to prioritize their pentesting efforts on the critical areas, ensuring that these vulnerabilities were resolved before the attackers could exploit them.

Why Threat-Driven Testing is Essential for DevOps

The future of pentesting in DevOps lies in shifting from compliance-focused to threat-driven approaches. By aligning testing with real-world risks, organizations can move beyond a static checklist and address the actual threats they face. This approach offers a more holistic and adaptable security strategy.

The DevOps teams can combine threat modeling with red team exercises and adversary simulations to test their defenses against sophisticated attack scenarios. These simulations emulate real-world adversaries, allowing the organizations to see how they would fare against insider threats or advanced persistent threats (APTs). This level of testing, driven by identified risks, ensures that your security posture can evolve as your system evolves.

Conclusion: Moving Beyond Compliance for Stronger Security

Relying solely on compliance-driven pentesting is no longer enough to safeguard modern, fast-moving DevOps environments. To stay ahead of the evolving threats, organizations need to integrate threat modeling into their security strategies. This approach goes beyond checking boxes — it enables teams to identify the most critical risks and address them proactively.

By adopting structured threat modeling frameworks, automating the process and embedding it into CI/CD pipelines, the DevOps teams can ensure that security is an ongoing, integral part of their workflow. Collaboration across teams further ensures that the security model aligns with both the system architecture and operational goals.

As attackers continuously evolve their tactics, your testing strategies must evolve too. Do not stop at compliance — embrace threat-driven pentesting and build a security posture that is ready for the real-world threats your organization faces.