DevSecOps, a concept that promises both speed and security in software development, has captivated organizations worldwide. The idea of seamlessly integrating security into the DevOps pipeline sounded like a game changer, but organizations soon found their DevSecOps’s “best” practices turning against them. Instead of streamlining processes, organizations are finding themselves buried under mountains of reported vulnerabilities and hindered by gates that impede progress where they were meant to facilitate. DevSecOps has promise and pitfalls, and we need a path forward to achieve a balance between speed and security.

What is DevSecOps?

DevSecOps — short for development, security and operations — is the approach of blending the agility of DevOps with the robustness of security. In theory, DevSecOps enables organizations to develop and release software rapidly while safeguarding against vulnerabilities and threats.

Step 1 of 7

14%

Which of the following best describes how you currently monitor and manage systems across your hybrid cloud environment?(Required)

Multiple separate tools for different environments

Multiple separate tools for different monitoring and management functions

Single consolidated dashboard

Custom built monitoring and management solution

No full monitoring and management solution

Don’t know

How valuable would it be for your monitoring and management solution to incorporate predictive analytics to help you identify and address system issues that are critical and not waste time or effort working through all the data and “noise” that is not critical?(Required)

Extremely valuable

Moderately valuable

Somewhat valuable

Slightly valuable

Not valuable

How do you most typically address potential system issues BEFORE they impact your operations?(Required)

Automated workflows and playbooks to remediate potential issues as soon as they are detected

An orchestrated response process that leverages automation, AI, and human expertise to rapidly respond to potential issues

Advanced monitoring tools such as predictive analytics and anomaly detection to proactively identify and address potential issues

Respond to issues as they arise, using manual processes and troubleshooting techniques

A combination of automated remediation, orchestrated response, and/or proactive monitoring to address potential system issues

Don’t know

Other

What methods does your organization use to control and monitor cloud/IT spending?(Required)

Centralized procurement processes

Pre-approved budget thresholds

Automated cost monitoring tools

Department-level spending controls

Regular cost audits and reviews

Cloud cost optimization platform

Approval workflows for resource provisioning

Native financial operations tools provided by the cloud provider

No formal controls in place

Don’t know

Other

Please specify:

Which methods do you rely on most to detect security vulnerabilities in your systems?(Required)

Automated scanning tools

Manual assessments

Vendor notifications

Threat modeling (for early detection)

None of these

Don’t know

Other

Please specify:

What are the TWO most common ways you prioritize vulnerabilities to address within your environment?(Required)

Based on potential impact

Based on exploitability

Regulatory compliance requirements

Based on CVSS scores

Risk-based analysis of multiple factors

First-in-first-out approach

No formal prioritization process

Don’t know

How do you typically handle system updates and security patches?(Required)

Automated updates and patches

Manually review and apply updates and patches on a regular schedule

A combination of automation and manual review

Apply updates and patches on an as-needed basis.

Outsourced update and patch management

No defined process

Don’t know

Other

Δ

By integrating security into the DevOps pipeline, organizations could identify and remediate vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle and reduce the risk of security breaches. DevSecOps was hailed as the solution to the age-old dilemma of choosing between speed and security in software development. However, as organizations embarked on their DevSecOps journey, they faced several unexpected challenges.

The DevSecOps Dilemma

While in theory, enhanced security practices should lead to fewer vulnerabilities, that is not the case. Code scanning for security flaws results in an overwhelming number of findings. Every commit triggers a barrage of reports, each highlighting potential vulnerabilities or security weaknesses. It is an unsustainable process. According to the August 2023 Synopsis DevSecOps survey, 53% of respondents reported that their organizations test the security of their business-critical applications at least weekly, with 31% testing them at least daily. As findings pile up regularly, critical fixes can take weeks or months. Organizations are becoming more aware, but are they more secure?

As organizations grapple with this dilemma, they suffer with the following unintended consequences:

● Development Delays: Security gates, designed to enhance security, often lead to development delays. Developers were forced to address all the reported vulnerabilities before code could progress, resulting in bottlenecks that slowed releases.
● Alert Fatigue: Development teams were overwhelmed by the sheer volume of security alerts. Sorting through countless reports to identify critical vulnerabilities became time-consuming and daunting.
● Misplaced Focus: The focus shifted from developing and releasing quality software to managing and addressing security alerts. Development teams found themselves spending more time on remediation than on innovation.
● Diminished Collaboration: Instead of fostering collaboration between development, security and operations teams, the DevSecOps paradox sometimes led to friction and frustration. Security teams, in their pursuit of thoroughness, unintentionally hindered development progress.

Not unexpectedly, most organizations practicing DevSecOps and facing these consequences removed the security gates that slowed development. Many are still scanning as part of the pipeline, but scanning alone does not make you more secure.

The Path Forward

To harness the true potential of DevSecOps, organizations must employ the following strategies:

● Foster a DevSecOps Culture: Cultivate a DevSecOps culture that prioritizes collaboration, education and shared responsibility for security. Encourage a proactive mindset and integrate security into the early stages of the development process.
● Adopt Contextual Analysis: Develop processes that consider the context of vulnerabilities. Establish a framework for prioritizing and addressing vulnerabilities based on their level of risk.
● Deploy Continuous Improvement: View security as an ongoing process of enhancement. Approach it with a crawl, walk and run mindset, and regularly assess and refine DevSecOps practices to adapt to evolving threats and technologies.
● Embrace Automation: Implement battle-tested, AI-driven security solutions capable of analyzing and fixing vulnerabilities. This approach reduces alert fatigue and ensures that development teams focus on the most critical issues while fixing recurring medium-to-low vulnerabilities. According to the 2023 Risks & Rewards of Generative AI in Software Development by Sonatype, more SecOps leads reported significant time savings from generative AI (57% save at least six hours per week vs. 47% for DevOps). These productivity gains demonstrate the potential of AI in DevSecOps.

The DevSecOps paradox reminds us that achieving harmony between speed and security in software development is a complex journey. However, by combining automation, cultural transformation, and proactive approaches, organizations can navigate this paradox and unlock the full potential of DevSecOps to achieve a synergistic blend of speed and security throughout the software development lifecycle.